Would this pass the test?

It will be the image that I will post on my PSB Agent Test.
Please tell me if it is good enough to approved or it has to be better, I am trying to do my best.

I'm not sure. Is that what the test calls for?

If the girl was on a seperate layer on top of the effect then I would accept it. But no because it is covered up...

BES please read and look at the test, he asked about it and in return you asked what he asked

Ok, 1)I changed the coordinates of the Nova Effect which had covered the girl. The effect is at the center now.
2)I added Wind Effect to the "CheatHappens Community Aid Agency" Text.

IMAGE =>

------
How about that one?

Tmh32293 wrote:

BES please read and look at the test, he asked about it and in return you asked what he asked

I apologize. In that case, I think the second image is MUCH better. But, wouldn't it be better to add the nova effect before applying the girl and then merge down?

/done

I tried what Bes have said, it covers the Nova Effect and ruins the half of the image background when copy-paste the girl, it won't work.

I am waiting for other Senates ideas...

... the test asks for it to be faded to white?
It also just looks kinda ugly imo.

@ 42:Yes, it's asking to be faded to white...

But it won't change anything if I do that with green and blue, I am not %100 sure actually and I don't wanna give wrong info...Ask TMH.

Sorry, it got double... My browser got lagged <_<

RaysoRb wrote:

@ 42:Yes, it's asking to be faded to white...

But it won't change anything if I do that with green and blue, I am not %100 sure actually and I don't wanna give wrong info...Ask TMH.

That's what it'd look like in a profile though. It looks stupid.

This is what it should look like when done





Really this would not be accepted to be used as a header the way dstates told you the dimensions he gave the entire profile.... Not what is not white... This is more of the size of the ACTUAL image in the header not counting the white...


And this is the header itself.....

Pwiz wont allow a header to take up the entire page, and yours does that I attempted to add it to my profile and it goes beyond the page limits and if whitened out it looks bad.

My image is the EXACT copy of my screen and since the site is on a fixed table and does not move for anyone base your size off of mine in the next creation.... The guide will be edited soon.

Actually, the size that dstates gave is the size of all the header images used on the site. Their tables aren't fixed. If they actually added your header to it, it'd be stuck behind the profile information and would the repeat itself. All of their header images use that size for the canvas, but have about half of it reserved to be just white. >_>
i.e.
see how there's white on the left half? That's how the images need to be made.


^proof that it wouldn't work

*sigh* should have worded it different. Im not talking about that.... I know for a fact the header image i supplied is to small hints me saying that... I am saying only make your ACTUAL image that size otherwise it will cover the text that is shown on the top of your profile. Use my header to determine the size of the image you want. Once that image is made add it to the white slate and then fade it with white...... My bad for wording that wrong.....

If your still puzzled here is an illustration for you... and more explanations of the above...

Spoiler:

@what im talking about editing,No where in the guide does it say or mention about the image not mixing with the entire profile.

42 I know what I am doing...

this thread could have been answered in a single post.

no, it could not pass the test.

why? because it simply does not follow the directions given.

why are directions important? because the test is supposed to simulate a range of photoshopping requests. if you do not adhere to a certain request, then the point in accepting it is lost.

/locked.